<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Want more Penrose puzzles?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.krazydad.com/blog/2008/01/want-more-penrose-puzzles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.krazydad.com/blog/2008/01/want-more-penrose-puzzles/</link>
	<description>Interactive art, experimental software toys, screensavers and games by Jim Bumgardner.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:46:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David__U@Hotmail.com</title>
		<link>http://www.krazydad.com/blog/2008/01/want-more-penrose-puzzles/comment-page-1/#comment-38083</link>
		<dc:creator>David__U@Hotmail.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krazydad.com/blog/2008/01/08/want-more-penrose-puzzles/#comment-38083</guid>
		<description>Thank you for all these great slitherlink puzzles!  I am completely addicted!  I do about 12 a day now.

To Gemini6Ice&#039;s request, here&#039;s an idea for a variation on a slitherlink: Do not allow &quot;sharp&quot; turns in the closed path i.e., no turns greater than 90 degrees.  

This restriction will give extra &quot;information&quot; to the solver, and it might mean that there will be fewer numbers needed in the puzzle, however, since the path won&#039;t bend so sharply, there won&#039;t be any 3&#039;s...which, along with 0&#039;s, give great places to start solving. 

BTW, I don&#039;t think I came up with this variant.  I seem to recall seeing such a puzzle (on hexagons perhaps) years ago, though I can&#039;t remember where.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for all these great slitherlink puzzles!  I am completely addicted!  I do about 12 a day now.</p>
<p>To Gemini6Ice&#8217;s request, here&#8217;s an idea for a variation on a slitherlink: Do not allow &#8220;sharp&#8221; turns in the closed path i.e., no turns greater than 90 degrees.  </p>
<p>This restriction will give extra &#8220;information&#8221; to the solver, and it might mean that there will be fewer numbers needed in the puzzle, however, since the path won&#8217;t bend so sharply, there won&#8217;t be any 3&#8217;s&#8230;which, along with 0&#8217;s, give great places to start solving. </p>
<p>BTW, I don&#8217;t think I came up with this variant.  I seem to recall seeing such a puzzle (on hexagons perhaps) years ago, though I can&#8217;t remember where.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gemini6Ice</title>
		<link>http://www.krazydad.com/blog/2008/01/want-more-penrose-puzzles/comment-page-1/#comment-36090</link>
		<dc:creator>Gemini6Ice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 01:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krazydad.com/blog/2008/01/08/want-more-penrose-puzzles/#comment-36090</guid>
		<description>New tiling? DELICIOUS!

Now, can you find some way to hybridize slitherlink with another puzzle type?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New tiling? DELICIOUS!</p>
<p>Now, can you find some way to hybridize slitherlink with another puzzle type?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
