<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Want more Penrose puzzles?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.krazydad.com/blog/2008/01/08/want-more-penrose-puzzles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.krazydad.com/blog/2008/01/08/want-more-penrose-puzzles/</link>
	<description>Interactive art, experimental software toys, screensavers and games by Jim Bumgardner.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 03:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David__U@Hotmail.com</title>
		<link>http://www.krazydad.com/blog/2008/01/08/want-more-penrose-puzzles/#comment-38083</link>
		<dc:creator>David__U@Hotmail.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krazydad.com/blog/2008/01/08/want-more-penrose-puzzles/#comment-38083</guid>
		<description>Thank you for all these great slitherlink puzzles!  I am completely addicted!  I do about 12 a day now.

To Gemini6Ice's request, here's an idea for a variation on a slitherlink: Do not allow "sharp" turns in the closed path i.e., no turns greater than 90 degrees.  

This restriction will give extra "information" to the solver, and it might mean that there will be fewer numbers needed in the puzzle, however, since the path won't bend so sharply, there won't be any 3's...which, along with 0's, give great places to start solving. 

BTW, I don't think I came up with this variant.  I seem to recall seeing such a puzzle (on hexagons perhaps) years ago, though I can't remember where.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for all these great slitherlink puzzles!  I am completely addicted!  I do about 12 a day now.</p>
<p>To Gemini6Ice&#8217;s request, here&#8217;s an idea for a variation on a slitherlink: Do not allow &#8220;sharp&#8221; turns in the closed path i.e., no turns greater than 90 degrees.  </p>
<p>This restriction will give extra &#8220;information&#8221; to the solver, and it might mean that there will be fewer numbers needed in the puzzle, however, since the path won&#8217;t bend so sharply, there won&#8217;t be any 3&#8217;s&#8230;which, along with 0&#8217;s, give great places to start solving. </p>
<p>BTW, I don&#8217;t think I came up with this variant.  I seem to recall seeing such a puzzle (on hexagons perhaps) years ago, though I can&#8217;t remember where.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gemini6Ice</title>
		<link>http://www.krazydad.com/blog/2008/01/08/want-more-penrose-puzzles/#comment-36090</link>
		<dc:creator>Gemini6Ice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 01:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krazydad.com/blog/2008/01/08/want-more-penrose-puzzles/#comment-36090</guid>
		<description>New tiling? DELICIOUS!

Now, can you find some way to hybridize slitherlink with another puzzle type?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New tiling? DELICIOUS!</p>
<p>Now, can you find some way to hybridize slitherlink with another puzzle type?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
